Those years are long gone. Not only because of the financial crisis of 2008, which required constant efforts to stabilise the markets, but also because of the evolving role of communication for central banks in a context of higher economic fragility and uncertainty. In stark contrast to the previous tradition, central banks are now committed to transparency towards the public, providing details on decisions taken and on strategies for the future.
Recent literature has recognised the impact of central banks’ communication on the economy, as a result of both the evolution of communication and the increased frequency of publications (Dincer and Eichengreen, 2014), focusing not only on content but also on the economic sentiment embedded in the documents.
Unlike other economic indicators, however, sentiment indices require ad hoc methodologies to measure qualitative information (Grimaldi and Apel, 2012; Correa et al., 2017; Armelius et al., 2019; Picault and Renault, 2017). Using textual and lexical analysis techniques we built the Prometeia Central Bank Sentiment Index (CBSI), an indicator of central banks’ sentiment. In particular, we applied the approach introduced by Loughran and McDonald (2011), consisting in the identification of words with positive and negative connotations within a document.
The four central banks we examined represent the most influential economies in the world: the European Central Bank (ECB), the Federal Reserve (Fed), the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the Bank of England (BOE). They are also ranked among the most transparent central banks (Dincer and Eichengreen, 2014), a necessary criterion for robust analysis.
We examined speeches and press releases published on their respective institutional websites between 2000 and 2020. Due to the heterogeneity of the database in terms of topics and length, we adopted the methodology of Net Score Index (Birz and Lott, 2011). Indeed, releases are generally short and standardised documents, whereas the structure of the speeches varies depending on the event and the speaker.
In line with the literature and in order to obtain the Prometeia Central Bank Sentiment Index, we performed a pre-processing procedure on each document (i.e. cleaning and standardisation), converting it into a corpus, that is, a structured and standardised text over which it is possible to perform statistical and computational analysis. Then, with tokenisation, the text is split into single words with relative frequency (as well explained by Grun and Hornik, 2011), thus preparing the term-document matrix to calculate the index.
By applying the Loughan-McDonald dictionary, whose validity is corroborated by its vast use in the financial field (Armelius et al., 2019; Shapiro et al., 2020), we obtained the match of the words with positive (and negative) connotations of the dictionary in each document. The Sentiment Index is calculated on a monthly basis for each central bank. It takes values between -1 and +1 and provides a measure of the central bank's view (positive, neutral or negative) of the economic context, thus giving indications on the possible direction of subsequent monetary policy decisions.
Chart 1. Fed and ECB Prometeia CBSIs
Chart 2. BoJ and BoE Prometeia CBSIs
Following the outbreak of the pandemic in January 2020, the indicator shows that sentiment has declined sharply for all central banks considered.
In detail, the ECB, led by Christine Lagarde, hit its historical low twice in a row, first in March (-0.499) and then in April with -0.519. The Federal Reserve reached -0.318 in March, when it introduced extraordinary policies to mitigate the effect of the coronavirus on the economy. Instead, The Bank of England sentiment has been stable at -0.50 from the beginning of the Covid-19 crisis, whereas the Bank of Japan stood at -0.471 last May.
After the period of more intense lockdown, sentiment is now showing a slight improvement, demonstrating that the policies adopted – both monetary and fiscal – are perceived as an effective tool for the recovery of the global economy.
The pandemic has caused large-scale negative shocks, requiring central banks to intervene to support the economy of the most affected countries. The need to adopt effective economic policies required a resolute and assertive communication to reassure markets and institutions about the real possibility of recovery. As Ben Bernanke (Alan Greenspan's successor) once stated: "monetary policy is 98 percent talk and only two percent action".